|
| Author |
Message |
Macedonia_15
Rookie
Joined: Dec 09, 2006
Posts: 45
Location: Macedonia
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 1:56 pm Post subject: Iverson Legend? |
|
|
Is A.I. becoming a legend? i know Kobe is but A.I.?
_________________
KING ---- 15 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Struggle
Rookie
Joined: Jan 01, 2005
Posts: 17
Location: Newark, NJ
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kobe legend? Are u kiddin me? Kobe is just a piece of aggorance. Michael is Legend that's who Legend indeed. May be Kobe is a legend for you only but what u said is really funny "you know Kobe is legend"...lol
however i wish Iverson to be one...he would...if he could win some champs in Philly...for now he is not a legend but just a player of very high level |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Struggle
Rookie
Joined: Jan 01, 2005
Posts: 17
Location: Newark, NJ
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sorry for mispellin the word i meant arrogance lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Macedonia_15
Rookie
Joined: Dec 09, 2006
Posts: 45
Location: Macedonia
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Struggle wrote: | Kobe legend? Are u kiddin me? Kobe is just a piece of aggorance. Michael is Legend that's who Legend indeed. May be Kobe is a legend for you only but what u said is really funny "you know Kobe is legend"...lol
however i wish Iverson to be one...he would...if he could win some champs in Philly...for now he is not a legend but just a player of very high level |
What the f*** are u talking man? i said i know kobe is going to be a legend! read!! and he is i dont like him but evryone must face it!
NEXT time respcet peoples opinions!
and U canot become a legend untill u retire!
_________________
KING ---- 15 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Struggle
Rookie
Joined: Jan 01, 2005
Posts: 17
Location: Newark, NJ
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
first of all i didnt disrespected your opinion ok but there is difference between object and subject opinions...Kobe is a strong and good player, he put a lot of efforts and showed his skills but he still not able to do anythin without Shaq...Shaq is just that lil "but" which cant let him be a legend...Michael became a legend because he had won all those great games almost by himself with his will and leadership...yes he had pippen, yes he had rodman, longley and so on but it was him who ruled the team. When Kobe and Shaq played together which of them was the leader? No one.
And a player may be a legend any time even when he still plays...I can see you talk not about legend but that a player's jersey being hung off under a palace dome. And thats great difference |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Struggle
Rookie
Joined: Jan 01, 2005
Posts: 17
Location: Newark, NJ
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
first of all i didnt disrespect your opinion ok but there is difference between object and subject opinions...Kobe is a strong and good player, he put a lot of efforts and showed his skills but he still not able to do anythin without Shaq...Shaq is just that lil "but" which cant let him be a legend...Michael became a legend because he had won all those great games almost by himself with his will and leadership...yes he had pippen, yes he had rodman, longley and so on but it was him who ruled the team. When Kobe and Shaq played together which of them was the leader? No one.
And a player may be a legend any time even when he still plays...I can see you talk not about legend but that a player's jersey being hung off under a palace dome. And thats great difference |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Macedonia_15
Rookie
Joined: Dec 09, 2006
Posts: 45
Location: Macedonia
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Struggle wrote: | first of all i didnt disrespect your opinion ok but there is difference between object and subject opinions...Kobe is a strong and good player, he put a lot of efforts and showed his skills but he still not able to do anythin without Shaq...Shaq is just that lil "but" which cant let him be a legend...Michael became a legend because he had won all those great games almost by himself with his will and leadership...yes he had pippen, yes he had rodman, longley and so on but it was him who ruled the team. When Kobe and Shaq played together which of them was the leader? No one.
And a player may be a legend any time even when he still plays...I can see you talk not about legend but that a player's jersey being hung off under a palace dome. And thats great difference | that aint true MJ Became a legend after he retitred. and Kobe Pulled off many things for Lakers. But if MJ didnt have Pippen and the other guys i would say 3 titles not 6
_________________
KING ---- 15 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Struggle
Rookie
Joined: Jan 01, 2005
Posts: 17
Location: Newark, NJ
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
im gonna repeat myself that u talkin about jerseys being hangin off under domes...Mike was a legend already back in the begining of 90's...Darius"Hooked"Mitchell, the guy shorter than 6 feet never played in NBA but he is a legend for his abilty to fly...
Please define for urself what ur talkin about - legendarity or being in hall of fame or have ur jersey under dome. Many players have their jerseys under domes but only few of them are legends...
Yes Kobe pulled off many things and that what makes him a player of superstar level but not a legend.
It's useless to talk about how many titles would MJ have if not his mates however fact remains that it was him who def won the titles...Just go back to times when MJ was out of the league but playin baseball...Chicago was nothin but average team... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Macedonia_15
Rookie
Joined: Dec 09, 2006
Posts: 45
Location: Macedonia
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Struggle wrote: | im gonna repeat myself that u talkin about jerseys being hangin off under domes...Mike was a legend already back in the begining of 90's...Darius"Hooked"Mitchell, the guy shorter than 6 feet never played in NBA but he is a legend for his abilty to fly...
Please define for urself what ur talkin about - legendarity or being in hall of fame or have ur jersey under dome. Many players have their jerseys under domes but only few of them are legends...
Yes Kobe pulled off many things and that what makes him a player of superstar level but not a legend.
It's useless to talk about how many titles would MJ have if not his mates however fact remains that it was him who def won the titles...Just go back to times when MJ was out of the league but playin baseball...Chicago was nothin but average team... |
Ok we are getting out of the topic. This topic is about AI being a legend. u can have ur opinions that i dont agree about MJ and Kobe but lets not get out of this topic. peace
_________________
KING ---- 15 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Struggle
Rookie
Joined: Jan 01, 2005
Posts: 17
Location: Newark, NJ
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok as for Iverson...Iverson not gonna be a legend he is just a spread world wide very known name though he is my favorite player.
If you think he worth callin legend please name the criteria which would make him one |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thaman
Rookie
Joined: Dec 21, 2006
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:44 am Post subject: Re: Iverson Legend? |
|
|
| Macedonia_15 wrote: | | Is A.I. becoming a legend? i know Kobe is but A.I.? |
kobe is good but kobe and ai have two differnt stlye and u CAN NOT compare them two but a great point so tell me more |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Macedonia_15
Rookie
Joined: Dec 09, 2006
Posts: 45
Location: Macedonia
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:47 am Post subject: Re: Iverson Legend? |
|
|
| thaman wrote: | | Macedonia_15 wrote: | | Is A.I. becoming a legend? i know Kobe is but A.I.? |
kobe is good but kobe and ai have two differnt stlye and u CAN NOT compare them two but a great point so tell me more | Tell u more?
_________________
KING ---- 15 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Struggle
Rookie
Joined: Jan 01, 2005
Posts: 17
Location: Newark, NJ
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| and yeah i wonder why people started comparin Iverson and Bryant? isnt that silly? its the same if we compared clocks u know arrows one which shows hrs and the other one - minutes. Both are arrows but show different things. Why wouldnt u compare Iverson and O'Neal or any other player? Yes we can compare who's better Iverson or Nash or Iverson or Hinrich, players of his amplua but it's useless to compare two different position players even though Iverson used to play number 2...it's elimination other than a rule |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
